RTOS Handle Interrupts : When working with embedded systems, the ability to respond quickly to external events is crucial. This is where RTOS interrupts and ISRs (Interrupt Service Routines) come into play. An RTOS (Real-Time Operating System) is specifically designed to handle interrupts efficiently and ensure predictable, low-latency responses to hardware events.
In this article, we’ll explore what interrupts are, how ISRs work, and how an RTOS manages them step by step with examples.
RTOS Handle Interrupts
What Are Interrupts in an RTOS?
An interrupt is a hardware-generated signal that tells the CPU to stop its current task and immediately handle a new event. For example:
- A timer interrupt triggers the scheduler to switch tasks.
- A UART interrupt signals the arrival of new serial data.
- A GPIO interrupt detects a button press.
Without interrupts, the CPU would have to constantly check for events (polling), which is inefficient and wastes processing time.
What Is an Interrupt Service Routine (ISR)?
An ISR (Interrupt Service Routine) is a special function that runs whenever an interrupt occurs. It is executed in interrupt context, which means:
- It runs with higher priority than normal tasks.
- It should be fast and lightweight.
- It cannot perform blocking operations (like waiting for a semaphore indefinitely).
Instead of doing heavy work, an ISR usually just:
- Reads or writes data from a hardware register.
- Clears the interrupt flag.
- Notifies a task to handle detailed processing later.
How RTOS Handles Interrupts (Step by Step)
Let’s break down the lifecycle of RTOS interrupts and ISRs:
Step 1: Interrupt Trigger
- A hardware event (like timer overflow or data received) raises an interrupt request.
- CPU looks up the ISR address from the Interrupt Vector Table (IVT).
- CPU saves the current execution context (registers, program counter, status flags).
Step 2: ISR Execution
- ISR immediately takes control.
- ISR performs minimal operations:
- Reads sensor/communication data.
- Clears interrupt flags.
- Signals the RTOS if further processing is required.
Step 3: Deferring Work to Tasks
- Since ISRs must be short, most RTOSes provide mechanisms to delegate work:
- Semaphores – ISR gives a semaphore to wake a task.
- Queues – ISR sends data to a queue for task processing.
- Event Flags – ISR sets an event flag that tasks monitor.
Step 4: Task Scheduling After ISR
- If an ISR unblocks a higher-priority task, the RTOS can immediately switch context to that task.
- Otherwise, the interrupted task resumes execution.
This ensures deterministic and low-latency event handling.
RTOS Management of ISRs
Rules for Writing ISRs in RTOS:
- Keep them short and fast.
- Avoid using blocking calls.
- Use ISR-safe RTOS APIs (like
xQueueSendFromISR()in FreeRTOS).
Advanced Features in RTOS:
- Interrupt Nesting: Higher-priority interrupts can preempt lower-priority ISRs.
- Critical Sections: RTOS provides APIs to protect shared data between ISRs and tasks.
- Context Switching from ISR: RTOS can trigger a scheduler immediately after ISR execution if needed.
Example: ISR Handling in FreeRTOS
// ISR: UART interrupt handler
void UART_IRQHandler(void)
{
BaseType_t xHigherPriorityTaskWoken = pdFALSE;
char c = UART_ReadChar(); // Read data from UART
// Send data to queue using ISR-safe function
xQueueSendFromISR(xUARTQueue, &c, &xHigherPriorityTaskWoken);
// Trigger context switch if a higher-priority task is waiting
portYIELD_FROM_ISR(xHigherPriorityTaskWoken);
}
// Task: Processes UART data
void vUARTTask(void *pvParameters)
{
char c;
for(;;)
{
if(xQueueReceive(xUARTQueue, &c, portMAX_DELAY))
{
printf("Received: %c\n", c);
}
}
}
Explanation:
- The ISR only reads data and sends it to a queue.
- A dedicated task (
vUARTTask) processes the data. portYIELD_FROM_ISR()ensures that if a higher-priority task is waiting, it runs immediately after ISR execution.
RTOS vs. Linux Interrupt Handling
| Feature | RTOS | Linux |
|---|---|---|
| Latency | Very low, deterministic | Higher, depends on kernel load |
| ISR Execution | Must be short and minimal | Often defers to softirqs / workqueues |
| Blocking Calls | ❌ Not allowed in ISR | ❌ Not allowed in ISR |
| Scheduling After ISR | Immediate task preemption possible | Work often deferred, less deterministic |
| Target Use | Real-time embedded systems | General-purpose systems |
Key Takeaways
- RTOS interrupts and ISRs provide fast responses to hardware events.
- ISRs must be minimal, fast, and non-blocking.
- Heavy processing should be deferred to tasks using queues, semaphores, or event flags.
- RTOS supports ISR-safe APIs to ensure safe communication between ISRs and tasks.
- By enabling deterministic interrupt handling, RTOS ensures reliable real-time performance.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on RTOS Interrupts and ISRs
1. What is an interrupt in an RTOS?
An interrupt in an RTOS is a hardware signal that tells the CPU to pause its current task and handle a more urgent event through an Interrupt Service Routine (ISR).
2. What is the role of an ISR in RTOS?
An ISR (Interrupt Service Routine) is a special function that runs immediately when an interrupt occurs. It performs minimal work, like reading data or clearing flags, and usually signals a task to handle detailed processing.
3. Why should ISRs be short in an RTOS?
ISRs should be short and fast because they block other interrupts and tasks while running. Long ISRs increase system latency and can break real-time behavior.
4. Can ISRs use RTOS APIs directly?
Not all RTOS APIs are safe to use inside ISRs. Most RTOSes provide ISR-safe functions (e.g., xQueueSendFromISR() in FreeRTOS) that allow safe communication with tasks.
5. How does an RTOS handle context switching after an ISR?
If an ISR unblocks a higher-priority task, the RTOS can immediately perform a context switch after the ISR, ensuring the task runs without delay.
6. What is the difference between interrupts in RTOS and Linux?
- RTOS interrupts: Deterministic, low-latency, designed for real-time response.
- Linux interrupts: Less deterministic, often deferred using bottom halves, tasklets, or workqueues.
7. Can ISRs nest in an RTOS?
Yes, some RTOSes support nested interrupts, where higher-priority interrupts can preempt lower-priority ISRs. This allows better responsiveness in time-critical systems.
8. How do ISRs communicate with tasks in RTOS?
ISRs typically communicate with tasks using:
- Queues (for passing data)
- Semaphores (for signaling events)
- Event flags (for notifying state changes)
You can also Visit other tutorials of Embedded Prep
- Multithreading in C++
- Multithreading Interview Questions
- Multithreading in Operating System
- Multithreading in Java
- POSIX Threads pthread Beginner’s Guide in C/C++
- Speed Up Code using Multithreading
- Limitations of Multithreading
- Common Issues in Multithreading
- Multithreading Program with One Thread for Addition and One for Multiplication
- Advantage of Multithreading
- Disadvantages of Multithreading
- Applications of Multithreading: How Multithreading Makes Modern Software Faster and Smarter”
- Master CAN Bus Interview Questions 2025
- What Does CAN Stand For in CAN Bus?
- CAN Bus Message Filtering Explained
- CAN Bus Communication Between Nodes With Different Bit Rates
- How Does CAN Bus Handle Message Collisions
- Message Priority Using Identifiers in CAN Protocol
Mr. Raj Kumar is a highly experienced Technical Content Engineer with 7 years of dedicated expertise in the intricate field of embedded systems. At Embedded Prep, Raj is at the forefront of creating and curating high-quality technical content designed to educate and empower aspiring and seasoned professionals in the embedded domain.
Throughout his career, Raj has honed a unique skill set that bridges the gap between deep technical understanding and effective communication. His work encompasses a wide range of educational materials, including in-depth tutorials, practical guides, course modules, and insightful articles focused on embedded hardware and software solutions. He possesses a strong grasp of embedded architectures, microcontrollers, real-time operating systems (RTOS), firmware development, and various communication protocols relevant to the embedded industry.
Raj is adept at collaborating closely with subject matter experts, engineers, and instructional designers to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and pedagogical effectiveness of the content. His meticulous attention to detail and commitment to clarity are instrumental in transforming complex embedded concepts into easily digestible and engaging learning experiences. At Embedded Prep, he plays a crucial role in building a robust knowledge base that helps learners master the complexities of embedded technologies.












