Learn the difference between CPLD and FPGA with clear explanations, architecture comparison, VLSI use cases, and CPLD vs FPGA vs ASIC insights.
What is the difference between CPLD and FPGA?
At first glance, CPLDs and FPGAs look similar. Both are programmable logic devices. Both replace piles of discrete logic ICs. Both are widely used in real products.
But under the hood, they are built very differently, behave differently, and are chosen for very different reasons.
In this article, I’ll clearly explain the difference between CPLD and FPGA, compare them with ASIC and CPU, and walk you through architecture, performance, power, cost, and real-world use cases. Whether you are a student, fresher, or working engineer, this guide will give you clarity that most short blog posts miss.
What Are Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs)?
Before diving into the difference between CPLD vs FPGA, let’s set the foundation.
A Programmable Logic Device (PLD) is an electronic component that can be programmed by the user to perform logic functions.
Over time, PLDs evolved into multiple categories:
- SPLD (Simple PLD)
- CPLD (Complex PLD)
- FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array)
Understanding the difference between SPLD, CPLD, and FPGA helps you see why CPLDs and FPGAs exist in the first place.
Difference Between SPLD, CPLD, and FPGA
SPLD (Simple Programmable Logic Device)
SPLDs include devices like:
- PAL
- PLA
- GAL
They are small, simple, and limited.
Key traits:
- Very limited logic
- Fixed structure
- Mostly obsolete today
CPLD (Complex Programmable Logic Device)
CPLDs came to overcome SPLD limitations.
Key traits:
- Medium complexity
- Predictable timing
- Non-volatile memory
FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array)
FPGAs are the most advanced PLDs.
Key traits:
- Very high logic density
- Extremely flexible
- Supports complex systems
So when people ask about the difference between PLD, CPLD, and FPGA, it mostly comes down to scale, flexibility, and architecture.
What Is a CPLD?
A CPLD is a programmable logic device made of multiple logic blocks connected through a programmable interconnect.
Think of a CPLD as:
A fast, predictable logic chip that behaves like fixed hardware once programmed.
Key CPLD Characteristics
- Non-volatile configuration (Flash or EEPROM)
- Instant-on behavior
- Deterministic timing
- Lower logic capacity than FPGA
CPLDs are commonly used for:
- Glue logic
- Boot control
- Simple state machines
- Address decoding
What Is an FPGA?
An FPGA is a massive array of configurable logic blocks, flip-flops, memory blocks, and routing resources.
Think of an FPGA as:
A blank digital chip that can become almost any digital system.
Key FPGA Characteristics
- Volatile configuration (SRAM based)
- Needs external configuration memory
- Extremely high logic density
- Highly flexible architecture
FPGAs are used for:
- Signal processing
- Image and video processing
- Networking
- AI acceleration
- High-speed interfaces
What Is the Difference Between CPLD and FPGA?
This is the core question, so let’s answer it clearly and directly.
Difference Between CPLD vs FPGA (High-Level View)
| Feature | CPLD | FPGA |
|---|---|---|
| Logic Density | Low to medium | Very high |
| Configuration | Non-volatile | Volatile |
| Power-On | Instant | Needs configuration |
| Timing | Predictable | Less predictable |
| Cost | Lower for small logic | Higher |
| Power Consumption | Low | Higher |
| Flexibility | Limited | Extremely high |
This table alone explains why FPGA vs CPLD is not about which is better, but which is suitable.
Difference Between CPLD and FPGA Architecture
Architecture is where the real difference lies.
CPLD Architecture
CPLDs are built using:
- Macrocells
- Product-term logic (AND-OR structure)
- Centralized interconnect
What this means in practice:
- Fixed and predictable delays
- Limited routing flexibility
- Excellent for control logic
FPGA Architecture
FPGAs use:
- Lookup Tables (LUTs)
- Distributed flip-flops
- Large routing fabric
- Dedicated DSP and memory blocks
What this means in practice:
- Massive flexibility
- Can implement CPUs, DSPs, and accelerators
- Timing closure can be challenging
This architectural difference explains most of the difference between CPLD and FPGA in digital electronics.
Difference Between CPLD and FPGA in Digital Electronics
In digital electronics, designers care about:
- Timing
- Power
- Reliability
- Simplicity
CPLD in Digital Electronics
CPLDs shine when:
- Timing must be deterministic
- Power-on behavior matters
- Design is small and stable
Example:
Reset logic, address decoding, simple FSMs.
FPGA in Digital Electronics
FPGAs shine when:
- Complex computation is required
- Parallelism matters
- Design evolves over time
Example:
Digital filters, protocol stacks, video pipelines.
So the difference between CPLD and FPGA in digital electronics is about control vs computation.
Difference Between CPLD and FPGA in VLSI
From a VLSI perspective, the difference becomes even clearer.
CPLD in VLSI
- Smaller silicon area
- Lower routing complexity
- Easier timing analysis
- Closer to ASIC-style logic
FPGA in VLSI
- Massive routing overhead
- Lower silicon efficiency
- Higher flexibility
- Faster time-to-market
This is why many VLSI engineers prototype in FPGA and finalize designs as ASICs.
Explain the Difference Between CPLD and FPGA and ASIC
Now let’s bring ASIC into the picture.
What Is an ASIC?
An ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) is a chip designed for one specific task and cannot be reprogrammed.
CPLD vs FPGA vs ASIC
| Feature | CPLD | FPGA | ASIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programmable | Yes | Yes | No |
| Performance | Medium | High | Very High |
| Power | Low | Medium to High | Lowest |
| Cost (Per Unit) | Medium | Medium | Lowest (High Volume) |
| Development Time | Short | Short | Very Long |
This comparison explains the difference between CPLD, FPGA, and ASIC clearly.
Difference Between CPLD FPGA and ASIC in Real Products
- CPLD: Boot controller in routers
- FPGA: Video processing in cameras
- ASIC: Smartphone processors
Each exists for a reason.
Difference Between CPLD vs ASIC
When people ask CPLD vs ASIC, the answer is simple:
- Choose CPLD when flexibility matters
- Choose ASIC when performance, power, and volume matter
ASICs win in mass production, but CPLDs win in control logic and low volumes.
CPLD vs CPU: Are They Even Comparable?
This is a surprisingly common question.
CPLD vs CPU
| Aspect | CPLD | CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Execution | Parallel | Sequential |
| Programming | HDL | Software |
| Flexibility | Hardware level | Instruction level |
| Determinism | Very high | Limited |
A CPU executes instructions.
A CPLD becomes hardware.
So CPLD vs CPU is not competition; it’s a completely different mindset.
FPGA vs CPLD: Which One Should You Choose?
Choose CPLD if:
- Logic is small
- Timing must be predictable
- Power-on behavior matters
- Cost matters
Choose FPGA if:
- Design is complex
- Parallel processing is needed
- Future changes are expected
- Performance matters
This practical advice helps beginners understand the difference between CPLD vs FPGA beyond theory.
What Is the Difference Between CPLD and FPGA in Simple Words?
If I had to explain it simply:
- CPLD is like a fixed tool with adjustable settings
- FPGA is like a toolbox that can become anything
Both are powerful when used correctly.
Differentiate Between CPLD and FPGA
In interviews, keep it simple:
A CPLD uses macrocell-based architecture with non-volatile memory and predictable timing, while an FPGA uses LUT-based architecture with volatile configuration and supports complex, high-performance designs.
That single sentence already shows strong understanding.
Difference Between CPLD vs FPGA: Power and Cost
- CPLDs consume less power
- CPLDs are cheaper for small designs
- FPGAs consume more power due to routing
- FPGAs are cost-effective for large logic
This is a practical design trade-off engineers face daily.
Why CPLDs Still Matter in 2025
Despite FPGA dominance, CPLDs are not obsolete.
They are still used because:
- They are reliable
- They are simple
- They boot instantly
- They reduce system complexity
Many modern systems use both CPLD and FPGA together.
Final Thoughts: Difference Between CPLD and FPGA
Understanding the difference between CPLD and FPGA is not about memorizing tables. It’s about understanding design intent.
- CPLD is about control
- FPGA is about computation
- ASIC is about optimization
Once you see that, everything else makes sense.
If you’re learning digital electronics, VLSI, or embedded systems, mastering this topic gives you a solid foundation that pays off for years.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): Difference Between CPLD and FPGA
1. What is the main difference between CPLD and FPGA?
The main difference between CPLD and FPGA is architecture and complexity. A CPLD uses macrocell-based architecture with predictable timing and non-volatile memory, while an FPGA uses LUT-based architecture with very high logic density and volatile configuration. CPLDs are best for control logic, and FPGAs are best for complex, high-performance designs.
2. What is the difference between CPLD and FPGA in simple words?
In simple words, a CPLD is used for small and fixed logic tasks, while an FPGA is used for large and flexible digital systems. A CPLD behaves like fixed hardware once programmed, whereas an FPGA can be reconfigured to perform many different functions.
3. Which is better: CPLD or FPGA?
Neither CPLD nor FPGA is universally better. CPLD is better for low-power, predictable, and small designs. FPGA is better for high-performance, complex, and data-intensive applications. The choice depends on design requirements, not superiority.
4. What is the difference between CPLD and FPGA architecture?
CPLD architecture is based on macrocells and centralized routing, which gives predictable timing. FPGA architecture is based on lookup tables, flip-flops, and distributed routing, which provides high flexibility and scalability but less predictable timing.
5. What is the difference between CPLD and FPGA in digital electronics?
In digital electronics, CPLDs are mainly used for control logic such as reset circuits and address decoding. FPGAs are used for computation-heavy tasks such as signal processing, communication protocols, and video processing.
6. What is the difference between CPLD and FPGA in VLSI?
In VLSI, CPLDs offer simpler timing analysis and lower silicon complexity. FPGAs offer faster prototyping, reconfigurability, and support for complex systems but with higher routing overhead and power consumption.
7. What is the difference between CPLD, FPGA, and ASIC?
CPLDs and FPGAs are programmable devices, while ASICs are fixed after fabrication. CPLDs are suitable for small logic, FPGAs for complex designs, and ASICs for high-volume, high-performance, and low-power applications.
8. What is the difference between SPLD, CPLD, and FPGA?
SPLDs are simple and limited logic devices, CPLDs are medium-complexity devices with predictable timing, and FPGAs are high-density devices capable of implementing complete digital systems. This progression reflects increasing flexibility and logic capacity.
9. Why is CPLD faster at power-up than FPGA?
CPLDs use non-volatile memory such as EEPROM or Flash, so they retain their configuration after power-off. FPGAs use volatile SRAM and must load configuration data at startup, which causes a delay.
10. What is the difference between CPLD vs FPGA in terms of power consumption?
CPLDs generally consume less power because of simpler routing and lower logic density. FPGAs consume more power due to complex routing, higher clock speeds, and large logic resources.
11. Can FPGA replace CPLD in all applications?
No, FPGA cannot replace CPLD in all applications. For simple, timing-critical, and instant-on control logic, CPLDs are still a better choice. Using an FPGA for such tasks can increase cost and power unnecessarily.
12. What is the difference between CPLD vs CPU?
A CPLD implements logic in hardware and works in parallel, while a CPU executes instructions sequentially using software. CPLDs are used for deterministic hardware control, and CPUs are used for general-purpose computing.
13. Is FPGA closer to ASIC or CPLD?
FPGA is closer to ASIC in terms of performance and complexity, but closer to CPLD in terms of programmability. FPGAs are often used as a bridge between CPLD-based control logic and final ASIC implementation.
14. When should I use CPLD instead of FPGA?
You should use a CPLD when your design is small, requires predictable timing, needs instant boot, and must consume low power. CPLDs are ideal for glue logic and system control tasks.
15. Is CPLD still relevant in modern electronics?
Yes, CPLDs are still widely used in modern electronics for boot control, power sequencing, and interface glue logic. Their reliability, simplicity, and instant-on behavior keep them relevant even today.
Read More : FPGA Interview Questions & Answers
Mr. Raj Kumar is a highly experienced Technical Content Engineer with 7 years of dedicated expertise in the intricate field of embedded systems. At Embedded Prep, Raj is at the forefront of creating and curating high-quality technical content designed to educate and empower aspiring and seasoned professionals in the embedded domain.
Throughout his career, Raj has honed a unique skill set that bridges the gap between deep technical understanding and effective communication. His work encompasses a wide range of educational materials, including in-depth tutorials, practical guides, course modules, and insightful articles focused on embedded hardware and software solutions. He possesses a strong grasp of embedded architectures, microcontrollers, real-time operating systems (RTOS), firmware development, and various communication protocols relevant to the embedded industry.
Raj is adept at collaborating closely with subject matter experts, engineers, and instructional designers to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and pedagogical effectiveness of the content. His meticulous attention to detail and commitment to clarity are instrumental in transforming complex embedded concepts into easily digestible and engaging learning experiences. At Embedded Prep, he plays a crucial role in building a robust knowledge base that helps learners master the complexities of embedded technologies.
